Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Johnson & Johnson

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 9 September 1988:
Vol. 241. no. 4871, pp. 1314 - 1318
DOI: 10.1126/science.3045970

Articles

Science, Vol 241, Issue 4871, 1314-1318
Copyright © 1988 by American Association for the Advancement of Science


articles

Rearrangement of the bacterial chromosome: forbidden inversions

A Segall, MJ Mahan, and Roth JR

Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112.

The order of genes in the chromosome of enteric bacteria has been evolutionarily conserved despite the existence of mechanisms for rearrangement. Homologous chromosomal sequences in the same orientation recombine to form deletions or duplications. When homologous sequences in inverse orientation recombine, one expects to form an inversion of the intervening chromosomal segment. This expectation was tested by placing pairs of homologous sequences in inverse order at various points in the chromosome. Sequences at many pairs of sites (permissive) do recombine to generate the expected inversion, while the same sequences placed at other pairs of sites (nonpermissive) do not form an inversion. For the one nonpermissive interval tested, the missing inversion type can be constructed by an alternative transductional method; strains with this inversion are viable. Thus mechanistic limitations must prevent sequences at particular sites from undergoing the recombination event required to form an inversion.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Chromosomal periodicity of evolutionarily conserved gene pairs.
M. A. Wright, P. Kharchenko, G. M. Church, and D. Segre (2007)
PNAS 104, 10559-10564
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Inference and Analysis of the Relative Stability of Bacterial Chromosomes.
E. P. C. Rocha (2006)
Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 513-522
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes.
E. P. C. Rocha (2004)
Microbiology 150, 1609-1627
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Gene essentiality determines chromosome organisation in bacteria.
E. P. C. Rocha and A. Danchin (2003)
Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6570-6577
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Genomic Rearrangements at rrn Operons in Salmonella.
R. A. Helm, A. G. Lee, H. D. Christman, and S. Maloy (2003)
Genetics 165, 951-959
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Associations Between Inverted Repeats and the Structural Evolution of Bacterial Genomes.
G. Achaz, E. Coissac, P. Netter, and E. P. C. Rocha (2003)
Genetics 164, 1279-1289
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Inversions over the Terminus Region in Salmonella and Escherichia coli: IS200s as the Sites of Homologous Recombination Inverting the Chromosome of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi.
S. Alokam, S.-L. Liu, K. Said, and K. E. Sanderson (2002)
J. Bacteriol. 184, 6190-6197
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Long CTG{middle dot}CAG Repeat Sequences Markedly Stimulate Intramolecular Recombination.
M. Napierala, P. Parniewski, A. Pluciennik, and R. D. Wells (2002)
J. Biol. Chem. 277, 34087-34100
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Genome Sequence of Yersinia pestis KIM.
W. Deng, V. Burland, G. Plunkett III, A. Boutin, G. F. Mayhew, P. Liss, N. T. Perna, D. J. Rose, B. Mau, S. Zhou, et al. (2002)
J. Bacteriol. 184, 4601-4611
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Cre-loxP Recombination System for Large Genome Rearrangements in Lactococcus lactis.
N. Campo, M.-L. Daveran-Mingot, K. Leenhouts, P. Ritzenthaler, and P. Le Bourgeois (2002)
Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 68, 2359-2367
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Pyrococcus genome comparison evidences chromosome shuffling-driven evolution.
Y. Zivanovic, P. Lopez, H. Philippe, and P. Forterre (2002)
Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1902-1910
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Localized Remodeling of the Escherichia coli Chromosome: The Patchwork of Segments Refractory and Tolerant to Inversion Near the Replication Terminus.
M. I. Guijo, J. Patte, M. del Mar Campos, J.-M. Louarn, and J. E. Rebollo (2001)
Genetics 157, 1413-1423
   Abstract »    Full Text »
Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. IX. Characterization of Insertion Sequence-Mediated Mutations and Rearrangements.
D. Schneider, E. Duperchy, E. Coursange, R. E. Lenski, and M. Blot (2000)
Genetics 156, 477-488
   Abstract »    Full Text »
Genome sequences of Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn and Chlamydia pneumoniae AR39.
T. D. Read, R. C. Brunham, C. Shen, S. R. Gill, J. F. Heidelberg, O. White, E. K. Hickey, J. Peterson, T. Utterback, K. Berry, et al. (2000)
Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1397-1406
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
A Rare 920-Kilobase Chromosomal Inversion Mediated by IS1 Transposition Causes Constitutive Expression of the yiaK-S Operon for Carbohydrate Utilization in Escherichia coli.
J. Badia, E. Ibanez, M. Sabate, L. Baldoma, and J. Aguilar (1998)
J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8376-8381
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Experimental surgery to create subgenomes of Bacillus subtilis 168.
M. Itaya and T. Tanaka (1997)
PNAS 94, 5378-5382
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Blocked RecA Protein-mediated DNA Strand Exchange Reactions Are Reversed by the RuvA and RuvB Proteins.
L. E. Iype, R. B. Inman, and M. M. Cox (1995)
J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19473-19480
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »
Genome Evolution at the Genus Level: Comparison of Three Complete Genomes of Hyperthermophilic Archaea.
O. Lecompte, R. Ripp, V. Puzos-Barbe, S. Duprat, R. Heilig, J. Dietrich, J.-C. Thierry, and O. Poch (2001)
Genome Res. 11, 981-993
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »



ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)