Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Johnson & Johnson

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 22 December 1995:
Vol. 270. no. 5244, pp. 1912 - 1914
DOI: 10.1126/science.270.5244.1912
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

News & Comment

Eliot Marshall

A lawsuit, headed for trial in Seattle next year, centers on a claim that researchers at one company used confidential information from a paper one of the researchers reviewed for Nature in their own research. The trial--if it takes place--could focus on what rules govern the use of information in papers that are sent out for peer review.


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES:
Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication: Setting the Balance Right.
D. Rennie (1998)
JAMA 280, 300-302
   Full Text »    PDF »
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today--Part 2.
J. M. CAMPANARIO (1998)
Science Communication 19, 277-306
   Abstract »


ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)