Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 31 October 1997:
Vol. 278. no. 5339, p. 777
DOI: 10.1126/science.278.5339.777h

This Week in Science

Previous assessments of global terrestrial responses to climate change have focused on direct responses to change in carbon dioxide or temperature. These near-instantaneous responses include, for example, the effects of increased temperature on photosynthesis and respiration. However, field ecologists have repeatedly suggested that indirect responses, such as feedbacks through soil water storage or nutrient cycling, may be more important. Braswell et al. (p. 870; see the news story by Williams, p. 802) offer a global assessment of direct versus indirect effects, and demonstrate the importance of indirect effects. The results also provide evidence at the global scale for major differences between biomes in both the direction and strength of these indirect effects: Large-scale modification of global ecosystems could alter the response of the biosphere to climate change.





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)