Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Johnson & Johnson

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 2 October 1998:
Vol. 282. no. 5386, p. 39
DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5386.39a

Random Samples

Turning a good idea for, say, a new deodorant into a product is often a painful journey--particularly for the lab animals that are sacrificed to show that a substance or chemical mixture is safe. Now a government panel has given its blessing to a new skin test that uses fewer animals, is more humane, and has even received high marks from animal rights groups.

The test, used to evaluate whether products will cause dermatitis, is the first to pass muster under a new federal program to help evaluate alternatives to current animal tests, called the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (Science, 4 April 1997, p. 41). The committee oversees peer review of proposed tests and forwards recommendations to more than a dozen federal agencies, which then decide whether to adopt a test.

In the standard skin test, a substance is painted on a guinea pig, which is then injected with a chemical that aggravates any skin reaction. In the new test, developed by scientists from three companies, a substance is applied to a mouse's ear. The animal is euthanized a few days later, and its lymph node tissue is examined for signs of an immune reaction. This test "spares the animal any pain and suffering associated with allergic contact dermatitis," says Martin Stephens of the Humane Society of the United States.

The new test can't replace the old one in all cases, such as testing metal salts, says committee co-chair William Stokes. However, he says, it may yield better data, because scientists know more about the mouse immune system than about that of guinea pigs.





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)