Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 30 October 1998:
Vol. 282. no. 5390, pp. 860 - 867
DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5390.860

News Focus

EMBARGOES:
Good, Bad, or 'Necessary Evil'?

Eliot Marshall

The embargo system--a decades-old gentlemen's agreement between science journals and reporters that keeps information from scientific reports secret until a journal publishes it--is under growing pressure. The system offers advantages for everybody involved: Journals get maximum publicity, journalists get time to report complex stories, and scientists get more widespread and more accurate public exposure for their work. But it is also wracked by built-in tensions: It can erect barriers to the free exchange of scientific information through which advances are made; it rules out the "scoops" on which newspapers and their reporters thrive; and it has created new problems when information that can send a company's stock price soaring is distributed to hundreds of journalists under an embargo. But the biggest threat is coming from Web-based publishing, which is speeding up the communication of findings outside the usual embargoed channels and making print publication dates somewhat arbitrary.

Read the Full Text





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)