Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Silencer Select siRNAs

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 4 December 1998:
Vol. 282. no. 5395, p. 1823
DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1823a
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

Letters

This Week's Letters

Letters discuss a new law that appears to require scientists to divulge the contents of even their laboratory notebooks under the Freedom of Information Act. A former official at the National Institutes of Health says that the act "provides several exemptions from disclosure" and that "careful attention may still forestall the catastrophe that some researchers and their institutions now envision." Another writer approves of the law. Questions are raised about advocacy on the part of scientists. Debate about the ethical and moral issues surrounding human cloning is advocated. And a spokesperson for the Environmental Protection Agency defends that agency's lead exposure prevention efforts.

Letters in This Issue

space space
[Letter] Freedom of Information Requests
William H. Goldwater; Michael Gough
[Letter] Science, Advocacy, and Credibility
Warren S. Wooster
[Letter] Human Cloning
Claire Nader and Stuart A. Newman
[Letter] Lead Regulation
Lynn R. Goldman. Response Bruce P. Lanphear
[Letter] Corrections and Clarifications


How to Submit a Letter to the Editor




ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)