Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Applied Bio

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 15 October 1999:
Vol. 286. no. 5439, p. 391
DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5439.391a
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

News of the Week

POLICING OF SCIENCE:
A Misconduct Definition That Finally Sticks?

Jocelyn Kaiser A White House panel was due today (October 14) to unveil the first government-wide definition of improper conduct in scientific research. True to long-circulating rumors, the new definition would narrow research misconduct to three specific acts: fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. But officials at the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy say they've fleshed out these categories to ensure that a variety of serious misdeeds are explicitly included. The proposed misconduct policy spells out a range of procedural steps for policing misconduct that all federal agencies would have to follow.

Read the Full Text

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)