Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 5 October 2001:
Vol. 294. no. 5540, pp. 26 - 27
DOI: 10.1126/science.294.5540.26
Prev | Table of Contents | Next

News of the Week

INFECTIOUS DISEASES:
Rapid Response Could Have Curbed Foot-and-Mouth Epidemic

Martin Enserink

To stop a catastrophic outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease, the British government has so far destroyed almost 4 million pigs, sheep, and cattle--a strategy that has been criticized as overly zealous and draconian by some farmers and animal welfare activists. But new studies from two teams of British veterinary epidemiologists show that, if anything, the measures haven't been strict enough. If the government had implemented a more rigorous culling policy in the first phase of the epidemic, the total burden would have been much smaller, the researchers say--and millions of animals would have been saved.

Read the Full Text

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)