Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 31 October 2003:
Vol. 302. no. 5646, p. 747
DOI: 10.1126/science.302.5646.747b

Editors' Choice: Highlights of the recent literature

When a new and apparently primitive organism is discovered, how can we decide if it truly reflects an ancient organism that evolved slowly over many millions of years or if it arrived at its present compact state by jettisoning pieces of its genome, having developed a relationship with another living being (that is, living as a parasite or symbiote)? Phylogenetic analysis of the ribosomal RNA from Nanoarchaeum equitans indicated that its ancestors might have been amongst the first archaeons, dating back to just after the split between Archaea and Eukaryota. This symbiont is only about 400 nm in diameter and lives in physical contact with the 2-m archaeon Ignicoccus.

Waters et al. have sequenced and analyzed the Nanoarchaeum genome (~490 kilobases). It contains many if not all of the components for handling genetic information (replication, transcription, translation, and repair) but lacks many of the biosynthetic enzymes to make building blocks such as amino acids and nucleotides; these are presumably acquired from its partner, either via membrane transporters, which are encoded in its genome, or by vesicular transfer from Ignicoccus, which would explain the need for physical contact. Unlike other cases of evolution by reduction, only about 5% of the genome does not code for proteins or RNAs, and few pseudogenes are present. Furthermore, the hot and anerobic environment (a submarine vent north of Iceland) in which Nanoarchaeum lives is similar to early life conditions. Taken together, this evidence is consistent with the proposal that this unusual organism is indeed primitive. -- GJC

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 12984 (2003)





ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)